Where Is Evolution Korea 1 Year From What Is Happening Now?
Wiki Article
Evolution Korea
The economic crisis that hit Asia caused a significant rethinking of the old system of government-business alliances and the management by the public of private risks. In Korea, that meant a shift in the development model.
In a controversial decision, the South Korean government has asked textbook publishers to ignore requests to remove examples of evolution from high school science texts. This includes the evidence supporting the evolution of horses as well as the avian ancestor Archaeopteryx.
1. Evolution and Religion
A South Korean creationist group has convinced textbook publishers to eliminate evidence of evolution from high school science texts. The Society for Textbook Revise, an independent branch of the Korea Association for Creation Research which aims to rid biology textbooks of "atheist materialism," was behind the decision. The STR claims that such materialistic views create a negative image for students and leads to their eventual denial of faith.
Scientists around the globe expressed worry when the STR campaign was featured in the news. Jae Choe, evolutionary biologist at Ewha Womans University, Seoul wrote in a letter to Nature's editor that South Korea had succumbed to religious prejudice. He was supported by colleagues from across the country who gathered into a group called Evolution Korea to organize an anti-textbook petition.
Some scientists are also worried that the STR campaign will spread to other parts of the globe where the belief in the spread of creationism is increasing. The letter to Nature warned that the anti-evolutionist movement will intensify pressure for revisions to textbooks in other countries, notably those with large Christian and Muslim populations.
South Korea's culture is especially strong in the evolution debate. 26 percent of South Koreans are part of a religious group, with the majority practicing Christianity or Buddhism. Additionally, a large portion of Koreans adhere to the Ch'ondogyo philosophy, which is based on Confucian principles which emphasizes harmony in society and individual self-cultivation. Ch'ondogyo is a way of teaching that the human being is one with Hanulnim, the God of Sun and that the heavenly blessings can be achieved by doing good deeds.
All of this has made creationism fertile field. A number of studies have demonstrated that students who have religious backgrounds tend to be more uncomfortable about learning evolution than those who are not religious. However, the root reasons for this phenomenon are unclear. One explanation is that students who have religious backgrounds tend to be as well-versed in scientific theories and concepts which makes them more susceptible to the influence of creationists. Another reason could be that those with religious backgrounds might view evolution as an idea that is atheistic, making them less comfortable.
2. Evolution and Science
In recent times, the scientific community has been concerned about anti-evolution efforts in schools. A study conducted in 2009 found that more than 40 percent of Americans believe that biological evolution is wrong and that believing in it would conflict with their religious beliefs. Despite the popularity of creationism in some states, a lot of scientists feel that the best method to counter this movement is not to engage it, but rather to educate the public on the evidence supporting evolution.
Scientists have a responsibility to instruct their students in science including the theory of evolution. They also need to inform the general public about the scientific process and how knowledge from science is gathered and confirmed. They must explain how scientific theories are frequently challenged and changed. However, misperceptions regarding the nature of scientific research frequently cause people to believe that evolution is not real.
For instance, many people confuse the term "theory" with the normal meaning of the word - a guess or guess. However, in science theories are thoroughly tested and verified using empirical evidence. A theory that survives repeated testing and observation becomes an established scientific principle.
The debate over evolutionary theory is a good occasion to discuss the importance of the scientific method and its limitations. It is crucial that people understand that science cannot answer questions about the purpose of life or meaning, but rather provides a mechanism for living things to evolve and adapt.
A well-rounded education should also include exposure to all major scientific fields including evolutionary biology. This is essential because a variety of jobs and choices require people understand the way science works.
The majority of scientists around the world believe that humans have evolved over time. A recent study that predicted the adults' opinions of the consensus on this subject found that those who had higher levels of education and scientific knowledge were more likely to believe that there is a consensus between scientists regarding human evolution. People with more religious beliefs and less science knowledge are more likely to disapprove. It is crucial that teachers insist on the importance of knowing the general consensus on this issue to ensure that individuals have a solid foundation for making informed choices about their health care, energy use, and other policy issues.
3. Evolution and Culture
A close relative to mainstream evolutionary theory, the concept of cultural evolution focuses on the various ways humans--and other organisms--learn from and with each other. Researchers in this field employ explanatory models and investigative tools that are adapted Evolution from those employed by evolutionary theorists. they reach back into human prehistory to determine the genesis of our capacity for culture.
This approach also acknowledges the difference between cultural and biological traits. While biological traits are largely inherited all at once (in sexual species, at fertilization) but cultural traits can be acquired over a protracted period of time. The acquisition of one cultural characteristic can influence the development and growth of a different.
In Korea for instance, the adoption of Western fashion elements in the latter part of the 19th and early 20th century was a result of a complicated sequence of events. One of the most important was the arrival of Japanese occupation forces, who introduced Western clothing styles and hairstyles to Korean society.
When Japan quit Korea in the 1930s, a few of these trends began to reverse. At the close of World War II, Korea had once again unified but this time under the rule of the Choson dynasty.
Today, Korea is an economic and political power. Despite the recent global financial crisis, the economy of Korea has been growing steadily over the last decade and is poised to maintain its steady growth in the future.
However, the current government faces numerous challenges. One of the most serious is its inability to develop a consistent policy to deal with the economic crisis. The crisis has revealed shortcomings in the policies of the country, especially its over-reliance on exports and foreign investment that may not last.
The crisis has shaken the confidence of investors, the government needs to rethink its economic strategy and find alternatives to increase domestic demand. It also needs to revamp the incentive monitoring, control, and discipline systems that are currently in place to ensure a stable financial environment. This chapter presents several scenarios of how the Korean economy might develop in a post-crisis world.
4. Evolution and Education
A fundamental challenge for educators of evolution is how to teach evolutionary concepts in a manner that is appropriate for students of different levels of development and ages. For instance, teachers need to be aware of the diversity of religions in their classrooms and create an environment that students who have religious and secular views feel comfortable in learning about evolution. Teachers must be able to recognize common misconceptions regarding evolution and know how to correct them in the classroom. Teachers must also have easy access to the various resources to teach evolution.
In this regard, the Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation was a crucial step in bringing evolutionary scientists and educators from a variety of disciplines to discuss best methods for teaching evolution. Participants included representatives from scientific societies as well as educational researchers, officials from government funding agencies as well as curriculum developers. The convergence of these diverse groups led to the identification of a common set of recommendations that will serve as the basis for future action.
It is crucial to include evolution in all science curricula at every level. To achieve this goal the National Science Education Standards (NRC) require that evolution be taught in a unified manner across all sciences, with a progression of concepts that are developmental appropriate. Additionally, a new publication from the NRC offers guidance to schools on how to integrate evolution into their life science curriculum.
Several studies have found that a more comprehensive teaching of evolution can lead to greater student knowledge and belief in the existence of evolution. However the estimation of the causal effect of evolution in the classroom is difficult because school curriculums are not assigned randomly and evolve over time as a result of the predetermined timeframe of gubernatorial elections as well as state board of education appointments. To overcome this issue, i use a longitudinal dataset that allows me control for state and years fixed effects as well as individual-level variations in the beliefs of teachers regarding evolutionary theory.
Teachers who are more comfortable in teaching evolution have fewer internal barriers. This is in line with the hypothesis that more experienced faculty are less likely to avoid questions about evolution in the classroom, and may be more inclined to employ strategies such as the reconciliatory method which is used to increase undergraduate students' acceptance of evolution.